Defense

View item information

Reuben R. Arnold, one of Leo Frank's two lead defense attorneys, in Collier's Weekly, December 26, 1914. Courtesy of University of Georgia Libraries via Digital Library of Georgia. 

Leo Frank’s lawyers challenged Jim Conley’s credibility, demonstrated that Frank did not have time to commit the crime, and collected testimony from multiple character witnesses. This was followed by a four-hour statement from Frank.

Frank’s defense drew attention to Conley’s lies and criminal record. Witnesses testified to Conley’s dubious behavior, particularly on April 26, the day of the murder. By showing detailed account sheets Frank was working on that day, the defense argued Frank was too preoccupied to do what Conley had claimed. Numerous witnesses testified to Frank’s good character, including Alonzo Mann, Frank’s office boy. Mann stated that he worked April 26, but did not hear or see Frank do anything unusual.

Finally, Frank took the stand. He spoke calmly but firmly, asserting Conley’s tale was fabricated, and that detectives distorted his statements to incriminate him. Frank admitted to being nervous after hearing of the murder, noting that any man in his position would be. He stated that Phagan came in for her pay soon after noon, left his office, and he never saw her alive again. He worked on a financial report, and then went home. He never saw Conley that day.

Soon after Frank’s statement, the defense rested.